What are the Risks of ESG Governance? – The National Law Review

what-are-the-risks-of-esg-governance?-–-the-national-law-review

Did you know that geoFence helps stop hackers from getting access your sensitive documents?

March 31, 2021


Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

  • Staffing Company Criminally Indicted for Targeting School Nurses in…
    by: Bruce D. Sokler
    and Farrah Short
  • Unemployment Insurance Fraud: U.S. Department of Labor Launches New…
    by: Steven M. Swirsky
    and Tzvia Feiertag
  • Interest in SPACs—Special Purpose Acquisition Companies—is booming……
    by: Stephen Fraidin
    and Gregory P. Patti Jr.
  • Good News/Bad News: Patent Owners and Petitioners Both Make Gains in…
    by: William A. Meunier
    and Sean M. Casey
  • Tax Issues and the New York Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act
    by: Glenn Newman
    and Shira Peleg
  • The State of Competition in the U.S. Healthcare Industry
    by: John D. Carroll
  • Finding the Weak Links – President Biden Executive Order Demands…
    by: Nikole Snyder
    and Townsend L. Bourne
  • Authorised Push Payment Fraud – court rules on scope of banks’…
    by: Katherine Wakeham
    and Chris Webber
  • DC Strengthens Worker Protections with Ban on Non-Compete Agreements
    by: Joseph E. Abboud
  • Health Care Enforcement Update: Covid-19 Fraud Cases Brought By DOJ…
    by: Grady R. Campion
    and Jane Haviland
  • Employers – 100% COBRA (or State Continuation) Premium Payment…
    by: Gini L. Hendrickson
  • The CPSC Digs In on Artificial Intelligence
    by: Kristin M. McGaver
    and Erik K. Swanholt
  • Challenging the Transfer of Non-Probate Assets
    by: Paul W. Norris
  • COVID-19: US State Policy Report – March 27-30, 2021
    by: Jeffrey L. Turner
    and Jacqueline Orfield
  • Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act Passes House, Awaits…
    by: Richard F. Vitarelli
    and Adam C. Doerr
  • COVID-19 Vaccine: New Paid Leave Laws for Public and Private New York…
    by: Lindsay Ditlow
    and Abigail M. Kagan
  • #WorkforceWednesday: DOL Electronic Notices Guidance, EEO-1 Reporting…
    by: George Carroll Whipple, III
  • Taking the Jump to Virtual with Jennifer Schaller, Managing Director…
    by: Sharon Berman
    and Megan Braverman
  • Eighth Circuit Orders New Trial for Unauthorized Data Access Under…
    by: Christina Lamoureux
  • New York State Legalizes Recreational Adult Use of Marijuana
    by: Harris M Mufson
    and Arielle E. Kobetz
  • Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance: What are the Risks,…
    by: Samuel L. Brown
    and Scott H. Kimpel
  • New European Commission Guidance: Acquisitions of Nascent Competitors…
    by: Hendrik Viaene
    and David Henry
  • Changing COVID-19 Guidance and Requirements Cause Consternation at…
    by: Courtney M. Malveaux
    and Cressinda D. Schlag
  • Tax Reform: 2021 Edition
    by: Christopher R. Gray
  • 340B in 2021: What Covered Entities and Their Partners Need to Know…
    by: McDermott Will & Emery
  • Creating Solutions to Racism Problem in Construction Industry
    by: Michael R. Hatcher
    and Janea J. Hawkins
  • Best Practices for Clearances and Opinions
    by: Lisa Adams
    and Alexander G. Roan
  • Antitrust Enforcers Preview Incoming Spotlight on Blockchain
    by: Stephen R. Chuk
  • Biden Administration Indicates Support for Union Neutrality Agreements
    by: Brian P. Lundgren
  • Future of the Workplace webinar 18 March – follow-up questions…
    by: David Whincup
  • EPA Reinforces Position that Certain Types of ECM Changes in Road-…
    by: David M. Loring
    and Sarah L. Lode
  • Business Groups Challenge Biden Administration’s Delay of Trump-era…
    by: Allan S Bloom
    and Eric D. Novak
  • China Issues the Measures for the Supervision and Administration of…
    by: Hunton Andrews Kurth’s Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Harvard Law Professor Warns Nasdaq’s Proposed Board Diversity…
    by: Keith Paul Bishop
  • How Your Car Became a Surveillance Weapon
    by: Theodore F. Claypoole
  • Ohio Highway Construction Company to Pay $315,252.93 to Settle…
    by: Danielle L. Dietrich
  • EEOC Announces New July 19, 2021 Deadline for Employers to Submit…
    by: Melissa Legault
  • To SPAC or not to SPAC — Key Considerations for Mid-Sized Private…
    by: Edward Dartley
  • Congressmembers Introduce The Baby Food Safety Act
    by: Food and Drug Law at Keller and Heckman
  • New EU Regulation for Export Controls of Dual Use Goods
    by: International Trade Practice at Squire Patton Boggs
  • USCIS Completes Lottery Selection Process for H-1B FY2022 Cap
    by: John F. Quill
  • Changes to AIFMD Marketing Rules from August 2021 – How will these…
    by: Kirsten Lapham
    and John Verwey
  • Commercial Division Limits the Reach of New York’s Long-Arm Statute
    by: Damani C. Sims

March 30, 2021


Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

  • SOT FDA Colloquia Series Will Include Webcast on the Toxicology of…
    by: Lynn L. Bergeson
    and Carla N. Hutton
  • Colorado Introduces a Comprehensive Consumer Privacy Bill
    by: Joseph J. Lazzarotti
    and Maya Atrakchi
  • Florida Enacts COVID-19 Business Liability Shield
    by: Kate L. Pamperin
    and Brooke C. Bahlinger
  • Post-SPAC Technology Company Hit with Securities Class Action
    by: Corey I. Rogoff
  • COVID-19 Enforcement Trends One Year Into the Pandemic
    by: Jonathan E. Meyer
    and Matthew T. Lin
  • The Next Wave of COVID-Related Criminal and Civil Enforcement Actions…
    by: Julian L. André
  • GAO Report Identifies Need for DOE to Address Risks to Electrical…
    by: Linn F. Freedman
  • What Happens Abroad, Apparently Does Not Stay Abroad – DOL Revokes…
    by: Ira G. Bogner
    and Robert M Projansky
  • ARPA Requires Tax-Free COBRA Subsidy
    by: Gretchen Harders
    and Susan Gross Sholinsky
  • WMC Sues DNR Again and Secures TRO in Effort to Block PFAS Sampling…
    by: Daniel C.W. Narvey
  • Polarizing Panel Suggests No Easy Road to Final ESG Regulatory Scheme
    by: Erica T. Jones
  • Understanding Risk in An Increasingly Risky World
    by: Liisa M. Thomas
  • California Employees Receive Two More Weeks of Supplemental COVID-19…
    by: Lindsay L. Ryan
    and Grant J. Horton
  • Three Stimulus Packages, and Undocumented Immigrants Still Struggle…
    by: Raymond G. Lahoud
  • Time Is Money: A Quick Wage-Hour Tip on … Tracking Employee Working…
    by: Paul DeCamp
  • Will Oklahoma Be the Next State to Enact a Comprehensive Privacy Bill?
    by: Lydia de la Torre
    and Ann J. LaFrance
  • NIL Update: NCAA vs. Alston
    by: Denis Braham
    and Michael Cruciani
  • Proposed NY Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act to Legalize, Tax,…
    by: Lynelle K. Bosworth
    and Katharine J. Neer
  • UK Insolvency Protection Laws Extended – Where Are We Now?
    by: Rachael Markham
  • Circuit Split Deepens as Eleventh Circuit Holds Administrative…
    by: Antonieta P. Lefebvre
  • COBRA Subsidies Under ARPA: Employer Action Needed
    by: Jessica N. Agostinho
  • Biden’s Nominee to the Fed. Cir. is Perkins Coie Litigator
    by: Warren Woessner
  • US Federal Labor Viewpoints – Week of March 22, 2021
    by: Stacy A. Swanson
  • OFCCP Releases Annual Veteran Hiring Benchmark
    by: Laura A. Mitchell
  • Under the Cover of Darkness: Insider Trading and the Dark Web
    by: Peter D. Hutcheon
    and Hon. Rebecca L. Warren (Ret.)
  • Brussels Regulatory Brief: March 2021
    by: Philip Torbøl
    and Mélanie Bruneau
  • Telehealth Update: States Move to Permanently Expand Access to…
    by: Cassandra L. Paolillo
    and Ellen L. Janos
  • Renewed Biden Administration Commitment To the International Trade…
    by: Gregory Husisian
    and Jenlain A. C. Scott
  • Does the Buyout Market Reflect a Competitive Imbalance in the NBA?
    by: Jack Blakey
  • Legislation Update: House Passes Bills on Dreamers, Farm Workers
    by: Sean G. Hanagan
  • Federal Agencies Intensify Focus on CARES Act Fraud
    by: Ripley Rand
  • Offshore Wind Energy Gets Boost from Biden Administration: 30 GW by…
    by: James M. Avery
    and Richard S. Novak
  • OFCCP Releases 2021 VEVRAA Hiring Benchmark
    by: Guy Brenner
  • Sleepovers and the NMW, Part II – clarity at long last for the UK…
    by: Fiona Sellers
  • Green Amendments: A Fundamental Right to a Healthy Environment?
    by: Samuel L. Brown
  • COVID-19: Shielding Businesses and Health Care Providers Acting in…
    by: April Boyer
    and Rio J. Gonzalez
  • U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Case Regarding TPS Status and Eligibility…
    by: Nicola Ai Ling Prall
  • Can You Add Your Parents to Your Health Plan? California Considers It
    by: Katherine Anne Sullivan Morgan
    and Hannah R. Demsien
  • Small NJ Medical Practice Becomes 18th Target of OCR’s HIPAA Right of…
    by: Joseph J. Lazzarotti
  • SEC Whistleblower Office Surpasses Record Number of Claimants…
    by: Mary Jane Wilmoth
  • What to Expect, Part II: New Stark Law Definitions for Physician…
    by: Joshua L. Stearns
  • SEC Seeks Public Input on Potential Changes to Climate Risk Reporting
    by: Megan L. Morgan
    and Leah A. Dundon
  • Enforcing Click-Through and URL Terms
    by: Alexander J. Civetta
    and Kati I. Pajak
  • “Fair Dismissal for Not Wearing Face-Mask” Headlines Hide Full Story…
    by: Sean Field-Walton
  • One More for Good Measure: Another Round of Mandatory Vaccination…
    by: Anthony J Oncidi
    and Michelle L. Lappen
  • 10 Tips to Increase Customer Reviews for Law Firms
    by: Kamron Sanders
  • Congress Extends Higher Debt Ceiling for Small Business Bankruptcies
    by: Lance P. Martin
  • New York to Join in the Legalization of Adult-Use Cannabis
    by: Morgan E. Persinger
  • Repeat TCPA Litigant Loses Because Court Lacks Jurisdiction in the…
    by: Brent Owen
  • Price Gouging Weekly Roundup: March 30, 2021
    by: Christopher E Ondeck
    and John R Ingrassia
  • Illinois Prejudgment Interest Legislation – UPDATE
    by: Melissa A. Murphy-Petros
  • Supreme Court to Weigh in on Presumption of Reliance in Securities…
    by: Jason M. Halper
    and Matthew Karlan
  • Vanilla Flavoring Class Action Lawsuit Against McDonald’s Dismissed
    by: Food and Drug Law at Keller and Heckman
  • Constitutional Challenge To AB 979 Moving Toward A Trial
    by: Keith Paul Bishop
  • European Regulators Publish Joint Opinion on the Jurisdictional Scope…
    by: Suzanne Bell
    and Robert Cannon
  • Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Property Owners’…
    by: Phillip L. Sampson Jr.
    and Richard F. Whiteley
  • EPA Announces Updates to TSCA New Chemicals Program
    by: Lynn L. Bergeson
    and Richard E. Engler, Ph.D.
  • New Orange Book And Purple Book Patent Listing Laws Impose New…
    by: Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
  • DOL Proposes Further Delays to New OES Wage Rule
    by: Matthew S. Groban
  • Influencer Held in Breach of ASA Code in £8,000 Prize Giveaway
    by: Carlton Daniel
  • Mississippi Student-Athletes Name, Image, and Likeness Law Awaits…
    by: Gregg E. Clifton

March 29, 2021


Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

  • Courts Rule On Jurisdictional Issues Involving Probate Orders
    by: David Fowler Johnson
  • States Continue to Step in to Safeguard Genetic Information
    by: Julia K. Kadish
  • US Senate Committee Introduces Clean Vehicle Charging Legislation
    by: Heather Cooper
    and Carl J. Fleming
  • EEOC Announces Employers Have Until July 19, 2021 to make their 2019…
    by: Guy Brenner
    and Rebecca S. Fishbein
  • New COBRA subsidies create urgency for employers
    by: Todd M. Cleary
  • Indiana Opens COVID-19 Vaccine Eligibility to All Hoosiers; Relaxes…
    by: Brian McDermott
    and Dorothy Parson McDermott
  • ACG Panel Paints a Bright Future for Healthcare Investment and Growth
    by: Aytan Dahukey
    and Eva Schifini
  • Weekly IRS Roundup March 22 – March 26, 2021
    by: Le Chen
  • New York State Lawmakers Consider New Taxes on Mezzanine and…
    by: Scott M. Vetri
  • Equal Pay Day and the continuing importance of the Equal Pay Act
    by: Eric Bachman
  • Steps Employers Must Take as Result of New COBRA Subsidy
    by: Leigh C. Riley
    and Cristina Portela Solomon
  • Indiana Joins States Prohibiting Employers From Mandating Device…
    by: David T. Wiley
  • Governor Signs Law Providing Additional Paid Leave to Employees for…
    by: Grant P. Alexander
  • Overdraft Class Action Litigation: Recent Developments in Maine
    by: Joshua D. Dunlap
    and Lucus A. Ritchie
  • One to Watch: Constitutional Challenges to NYC’s Price Gouging Rule
    by: Christopher E Ondeck
    and John R Ingrassia
  • California Expands and Resets COVID-19 Paid Sick Leave
    by: Sara Alexis Levine Abarbanel
  • Business Divorce: Court Held That Parties Did Not Form A Partnership…
    by: David Fowler Johnson
  • How Little May an Employee Allege for Retaliation Protection?
    by: Paul J. Siegel
    and Jenna E. Dysart
  • FDA Announces First Ever Facility Fees for OTC Drug Manufacturers
    by: Allison Fulton
    and Theresa E. Thompson
  • Labor Commissioner Issues FAQs for Supplemental COVID-19 Paid Sick…
    by: Michael T. Campbell
    and Kelly L. Hensley
  • Spotlight on PACE: PACE Projects From Downtown Redevelopments to…
    by: Laura L. Bilas
    and R. Lynn Parins
  • The Coronavirus Test: Indirect ‘financial effect’ of coronavirus…
    by: Restructuring & Insolvency Practice at Squire Patton Boggs
  • Distinguish “Smart Contract” From Abstract Idea To Pass Blockchain…
    by: Yunlai Zha
    and Weiguo (Will) Chen
  • SPAC Chat Ep. 3: Tracking Trends of the SPAC Surge
    by: Thomas R. Burton, III
    and Jeffrey P. Schultz
  • The Powerful False Claims Act You Don’t Know About: California’s…
    by: Sabita J. Soneji
  • Biden tax proposals: Why your board must inform itself
    by: Peter Wilder
  • The NFT Explosion – What Lawyers Need to Know
    by: FinTech Law Watch at KL Gates
  • California Labor Code Section 925 and How Employers Can Avoid It
    by: Jennifer G. Redmond
    and James V. Fazio
  • The 2019 Public Charge Rule Is Removed by DHS
    by: Barbara Chin
  • What the Heck Do Girl Scout Cookies Have to Do With Personnel…
    by: Colleen Naumovich
    and David J. Pryzbylski
  • Text Message Auto Attendant Lands Boston Market in New TCPA Class…
    by: Eric J. Troutman
  • Ah, It’s Bill Passing Season in California again – and No Employer is…
    by: Anthony J Oncidi
    and Dylan K. Tedford
  • Congress Pierces the Veil and Establishes Beneficial Ownership…
    by: Zachary H. Liebnick
  • 340B Update: Federal Court Halts 340B Administrative Dispute…
    by: Richard P. Church
    and Leah D’Aurora Richardson
  • Lawsuit Challenging EB-5 Regulations May Succeed
    by: Dillon R. Colucci
  • Manufacturers Should Prepare for OSHA’s New and Altered Proposed…
    by: Cressinda D. Schlag
  • Mexico Creates a Code of Ethics for E-Commerce suppliers, as well as…
    by: Gustavo A. Alcocer
    and Abraham Díaz
  • Big Changes to the Buy American Act for US Government Contractors
    by: Karen R. Harbaugh
    and Ludmilla L. Kasulke
  • Diversity Derivative Suit Dismissed
    by: Joseph S. Hartunian
  • EEO-1 Portal to Open April 26, Deadline For Filing Will Be July 19,…
    by: Laura A. Mitchell
  • § 314(d) Bar Does Not Defeat Federal Circuit’s Mandamus Jurisdiction
    by: Zan Newkirk
    and Christina Ji-Hye Yang
  • Changing Floors: Minimum Wage Increases for Health Leaders to Consider
    by: Denise Merna Dadika
  • Connecticut Medical Marijuana User Could Not Proceed With ADA Claims
    by: Stacey J. Lococo
  • Business Divorce Litigation Considerations: Strength in Numbers or…
    by: David C. Roberts
  • Exemptions Limited for Juice Preventive Controls
    by: Food and Drug Law at Keller and Heckman
  • More Good Creasy News: Court Certifies Interlocutory Appeal and Stays…
    by: Eric J. Troutman
  • New York State Issues Guidance on COVID-19 Vaccine Leave Law
    by: Evandro C Gigante
    and Arielle E. Kobetz
  • Bavarian DPA Declares Transfers to E-mail Marketing Service…
    by: Hunton Andrews Kurth’s Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • How To Kvetch About And To The DFPI
    by: Keith Paul Bishop
  • Weekly Bankruptcy Alert: March 29, 2021 (For the week ending March 28…
    by: Business Practice Group Pierce Atwood
  • Vicarious Liability Allegations Implausible: Case Dismissed
    by: Paul C. Besozzi
  • New Jersey District Court Declares NJLAD’s Ban on Employment…
    by: Michael J. Slocum
    and Ryan P. O’Connor
  • California Takes Steps to Incorporate Environmental Justice into…
    by: Samuel L. Brown
  • English Court Dismisses Jurisdiction Challenge to ICC Arbitration…
    by: Peter R. Morton
    and Edward A. Brown-Humes
  • FAQs on Telemedicine and HIPAA During the Public Health Emergency
    by: Nathaniel M. Lacktman
    and Aaron T. Maguregui
  • Commercial Agency Agreements in EU Competition Law
    by: Hans Urlus
  • A Farewell to the Current Gift and Estate Tax Exemption?
    by: John R. Sloan
    and Thomas J. Zamadics, Jr.

Hunton Andrews Kurth Law Firm known for complex legal matters in business law and litigation

Wednesday, March 31, 2021

Environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) – like climate change and environmental justice – has been a hot topic of discussion in the early days of the Biden administration. Illustrating the interconnectedness of the trending issues, climate change and environmental justice are pillars of ESG.

The ESG-related activity at the federal government is just getting started. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced the creation of a Climate and ESG Task Force to “develop initiatives to proactively identify ESG-related misconduct” with a focus, in part, on “material gaps or misstatements” in disclosure of “climate risks.” The SEC also raised the concept of developing a universal reporting framework and acting Chair Allison Lee explained that the SEC has “begun to take critical steps toward a comprehensive ESG disclosure framework.” The SEC is also signaling it may “consider the broader array of ESG disclosure issues,” beyond climate change (e.g., workforce diversity). The US Department of Labor (DOL) announced it would not enforce two Trump administration rules that – at least implicitly – could limit investments based on ESG. The DOL explained the rules appeared inconsistent with Executive Order 13990, “Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis,” and, practically, the DOL had heard “from stakeholders that the rules, and investor confusion about the rules, have already had a chilling effect on appropriate integration of ESG factors in investment decisions.”

While this post focuses on the ESG risks and opportunities in the US, there are ESG developments happening globally. In Europe, for example, aggressive actions are being taken on ESG-related obligations as part of the European Green Deal, and to facilitate the continent’s alignment with Paris Agreement climate targets and the European Union’s commitment to adopt the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The core of Europe’s ESG efforts include the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (requires certain companies to publish data on corporate activities and impacts on ESG factors), the Taxonomy Regulation (establishes a sustainability classification system), and the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (establishes an obligation on fund managers, financial advisers and other regulated firms to disclose information on various ESG considerations).

As ESG takes global center stage, there are practical questions being raised regarding what are the quantifiable risks associated with a company not addressing ESG. For public companies in the US, one clear risk is the increased likelihood the Biden administration’s SEC will pursue enforcement under existing authorities for company disclosures that, for example, fail to meaningfully identify material issues or quantify impacts or risks associated with climate change. Another risk doesn’t come from the federal government, but rather from institutional investors and shareholders. Much is made of the “shareholder primacy” theory in corporate governance and its requirement that board members act in a manner that maximizes value of shareholders ahead of other stakeholders (e.g., employees, society, local communities, and consumers). But the view of delivering value to shareholders has been argued to include long-term value, which would require consideration of ESG-related issues. A board of directors considering ESG, the argument goes, can preserve the company’s reputation by creating long term value for stakeholders and concomitantly avoiding the potential destruction of shareholder wealth. There are an increasing number of ESG rating agencies that provide “scorecards” or otherwise identify company-specific ESG issues (e.g., Sustainalytics, MSCI), which are designed to help identify long-term corporate value and risks.

Earlier this year Blackrock explained in the Our 2021 Stewardship Expectations statement that it “expect[s] companies to demonstrate how climate and sustainability-related risks are considered and integrated into their strategy” and “[i]f a company does not provide adequate public disclosures . . . to assess how material risks are addressed, we will conclude that those issues are not appropriately managed and mitigated.” The expectation is the 2021 corporate annual general meetings will see significant developments related to ESG, with resolutions voted on for some of the world’s largest companies focused on climate, human rights, biodiversity, employee issues, and racial equality.

“ESG” means different things to different people. Often ESG is simply associated with public company disclosures and sustainable investing. What about private companies that do not publicly disclose to the SEC and do not need to answer to shareholders? What ESG risks do they face? The importance of ESG – to date – has been less about ESG-specific laws or regulations mandating corporate action, but broader risks associated with the reputational, financial, and legal impacts of handling ESG issues poorly. Below are some of the risks that companies – including private companies – should consider as they think strategically about internal policies and resource allocation focused on ESG.

  • Risks to Corporate Reputation. Social media and other electronic information sharing plat­forms have dramatically increased visibility and scrutiny of corporate activity. Images of oil spills, employee claims of harassment or discrimination or unequal pay, allegations of ecosystems and indigenous com­munities impacted by extractive industry projects, a company cyber security breach that exposes customer data, or stories of child labor can all go viral and circle the globe in hours. For companies, the implications can be significant: such a scenario can damage corporate profits and career prospects of executives and board members; jeopardize supply agreements and consumer loyalty; and amplify risk of government investigations, enforcement, and litigation.

  • Risks to Project Financing. Many of the world’s major financial institutions have committed themselves to assessing and managing environmental and social risks associated with project financing via the Equator Principles. The Equator Principles oblige financial institutions to make informed investment decisions and withhold or withdraw financing on projects or assets not conforming to “good international industry practice.” The Equator Principles incorporate, for example, the International Finance Corporation’s Environmental and Social Performance Standards, which include standards similar to ESG metrics (g., Performance Standard 1: Assessment and Management of Environmental and Social Risks and Impacts). A company that ignores ESG considerations may be neglecting the types of standards that are necessary to obtain or retain financing for projects and operations.

  • Legal Liability Risks. Neglecting ESG considerations can result in litigation risk – at least the need for companies to defend themselves in court against perceived or alleged neglect. For example, ESG includes a focus on raw material sourcing and supply chain risks, with an emphasis on human rights, child labor, and other considerations. Cobalt is a key input for batteries used in electric vehicles – the center piece for decarbonization of the transportation sector – and other products, but more than half of the world’s cobalt is found in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), where child labor in artisanal mining is estimated to account for approximatively 20 percent of cobalt exports. Using cobalt as an example, there are supply chain-focused tools and organizations focused on minimizing risks associated with the extraction and utilization of cobalt in downstream uses by companies. However, it is up to downstream users to take steps to appropriately mitigate risks as part of corporate ESG policies. Technology and automotive companies, for example, are currently defending a class action lawsuit brought by plaintiffs representing parents of children killed or maimed at cobalt mining operations in the DRC. Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Apple Inc. et al., 19-CV-03737 (D.D.C).

  • Risks Associated with Lack of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. The events of the last year have been pivotal in motivating a concerted focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion issues, including expectations concerning board and workforce racial and gender diversity. There are significant potential downsides, reputational and otherwise, from having workforces that substantially diverge from the customers and communities corporations serve. Some companies are linking executive compensation to meeting certain ESG metrics, including diversity metrics. However, this is an illustrative example of where companies must be strategic and thoughtful about ESG policies and associated implementation to avoid unintended consequences. Employment laws generally prohibit the consideration of protected characteristics, including race and gender, in any employment decision. This means programs that give preferential treatment to a protected minority group in the terms and conditions of employment can create legal exposure if they are not carefully designed and implemented.

  • Risks Based on Lobbying. We are seeing increased focus from governments, investors and NGOs on the lobbying positions of trade associations and how those positions align with the statements of member companies. Earlier this year, for example, companies were questioned via Congressional inquiry on their interactions with trade associations and the groups’ positions on climate change. On this issue, from the investor perspective, BlackRock explained that “we expect companies to monitor the positions taken by trade associations of which they are active members on such issues for consistency on major policy positions and to provide an explanation where inconsistencies exist.” CERES, an influential NGO that makes the “financial business case for sustainability,” in an open letter to corporations called on them to “[a]lign your trade associations’ lobbying with a path to net zero by 2050” and correspondingly “[a]llocate your spending on lobbying and other channels of political influence in ways that advance and do not obstruct, a path to net zero by 2050.” As part of implementation of ESG policies, companies will want to monitor closely the advocacy of their trade associations given this increased scrutiny.

  • Risks from Lack of Corporate ESG Coordination. Most public companies have multiple divisions and operating units. There may be risks if a public company is not coordinating across its divisions and operating units on ESG-related implementation. This is particularly true if a public company is factoring the operations of private subsidiaries into, for example, public reporting or sustainability reports. Often different components of a multinational corporation will have different leadership, organization, work cultures, and other distinctions that can make coordination and alignment on ESG issues difficult. The ESG priorities of the Biden administration and institutional investors and the associated risks noted above may also be relevant and indirectly applicable to private companies that are subsidiaries of public companies and illustrates the importance of ESG risk management even for private companies.

  • Risks Associated with Lost Opportunities. ESG is not just about managing risks, but also about seizing opportunities. Managing ESG issues well can enhance corporate value and performance and create competitive advantages against industry peers that could otherwise go uncaptured. In an economy dependent on international trade, global supply chains and diverse workforces, public and non-public companies alike should explore opportunities not only with environmental issues, such as climate change, but also issues like product safety and stakeholder relationships with regulators and the communities in which they operate. Recent studies conducted on ESG related issues in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic indicate that companies are better positioned to withstand the consequences of unexpected shocks if their management strategies account for the macro-effects of so-called societal “megatrends,” such as diversity and inclusion and climate change. Companies that invest first in new technologies, for example, to mitigate climate change, or prioritize a diverse workforce, can set themselves apart from their peers and seize unrealized value. Given the opinions of Gen Z and Millennial workers, corporate embrace and management of ESG issues can also add value to workforce strategies. In the global competition for talent necessary to drive future corporate growth, ESG issues can be a competitive advantage to attracting and retaining talent.

We expect significant additional developments on ESG-related issues in the short-term – at the same time there are once-in-a-generation movements on issues like climate change, environmental justice, racial equality, and the role of corporations in society. New risks and opportunities will emerge and corporate strategies will need to adapt to identify opportunities and mitigate risks.


Copyright © 2020, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP. All Rights Reserved.
National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 90


Samuel L. Brown Environmental Practice Hunton Andrews Kurth San Francisco, CA

A former US EPA lawyer, Sam brings deep knowledge and practical experience to his clients’ environmental and natural resource concerns, helping them navigate the demands of regulatory agencies, ensure facility and corporate compliance, respond to government investigations and defend against enforcement actions.

Sam is experienced in domestic and international environmental and natural resource matters that impact client business and operations. His clients primarily include public and private sector manufacturing, mining, electric utility, oil and gas, municipal drinking water and…

Scott H. Kimpel Capital Markets and Securities Practice Hunton Andrews Kurth Washington, DC

Scott brings in-depth knowledge of SEC policies, procedures and enforcement philosophy to each representation.

Scott regularly advises clients across a broad sector of the economy facing sensitive reporting, compliance and enforcement matters before the Securities and Exchange Commission and other capital markets regulators. His practice encompasses a wide range of matters involving the securities laws, mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, regulatory enforcement, administrative law and public policy. Scott also leads the firm’s working group on blockchain and distributed…

Shannon Broome Environmental Attorney Hunton Andrews Kurth Law Firm

Shannon is the managing partner of the firm’s San Francisco office and leads the firm’s California environmental practice.  Her prior experience as a chemical engineer in the oil and gas industry affords her unparalleled insights into the development of regulations and counsel on environmental, health and safety issues. Shannon also maintains an office in Washington, DC. Splitting her time between these offices allows her to help her clients wherever they may be. Shannon’s work focuses on permitting, enforcement, environmental incident response, and regulatory advocacy and litigation….

Charles H. Knauss Environmental Attorney Hunton Andrews Kurth

Chuck Knauss has been repeatedly lauded by clients in Chambers USA. From 2011 through 2016, Chambers USA has reported that Chuck impresses clients with his “extraordinary strategic and analytical capabilities—he finds solutions others just cannot see … and has great understanding of how government agencies work.” For more than 30 years he has been on the frontlines of environmental law, pioneering work on behalf of clients in the US manufacturing and energy sectors. Clients call him a “legend in the field” and an “absolutely superb lawyer, top of [our]…

David C. McSweeney Environmental, Health & Safety Attorney Hunton Andrews Kurth Boston, MA

David counsels clients through the lens of a former in-house attorney to provide insightful and practical advice. He understands a client’s business and the unique policies related to environmental, health and safety (EHS) legal issues associated with permitting, compliance, transactional due diligence, regulatory development, enforcement defense and related litigation.

David’s practice focuses on EHS matters, especially those involving the Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Resource…

To sum up, let me just add that geoFence blocks unwanted traffic and disables remote access from FSAs and that’s the a fact.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *